“For many years, we have been using both flexible laser lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) like video games without wondering what kind of pressures or what kind of temperatures we are generating inside the kidney,” Prof. Liatsikos stated. Previous research has shown that even with just 1 second of power dangerous temperatures can be reached, whereas the normalisation of the temperature typically requires 5 seconds [2]. Moreover, the current state-of-the-art high-power holmium laser and the superpulse thulium fibre lasers both increase irrigation fluid temperature. The cellular injury threshold is 43°C, which is easily exceeded when low irrigation is combined with high power [3]. Prof. Liatsikos stressed that even as little as 5 W could result in tissue damage if the irrigation is inadequate (≤30 mL/min) [3]. Irrigation should be >100 mL/min for powers higher than 30 W. Laser power >100 W is never recommended.
While excellent at ablation, a recent study showed that the superpulse thulium laser is not safer with regard to temperatures when directly compared with the holmium laser [4]. In this study, no differences were found between the inlet and outlet thermocouple readings when exposed to 8 W, 16 W, or 40 W. There was no substantial difference in the maximum temperature rise of water in the vicinity of the illuminated volume between the 2 laser systems. Thus, it can be concluded that irrigation is still a problem for superpulse thulium laser technology; a conclusion which was further supported in another study observing a rapid temperature above threshold in the absence of irrigation using a superpulse thulium laser [5].
Fortunately, the kidney can be protected from thermal damage by using a UAS, which kept the renal temperature increase borderline [6]. This UAS buffering effect disappeared with the use of higher laser-power settings (i.e. 40 W and 60 W) with the maximal temperature exceeding 60°C. Moreover, laser activation at 60 W was associated with a very rapid increase in renal temperature within a few seconds. Under pump irrigation, laser activation at 60 W for 60 seconds was associated with a safe temperature <45°C, even without the use of a UAS. The authors of this study concluded that high power settings (>40 W) require high irrigation flow [6]. The use of a UAS is advisable to reduce the temperature and balance any intrarenal pressure increase. Furthermore, Breda and collaborators showed that the use of a UAS provides increased irrigation inflow by 35-80% compared with the flexible scope alone, as well as improved intraoperative vision [7].
Other studies have investigated irrigation with temperature rates and showed that no irrigation leads to high temperature with as low as 5 W power [8,9]. Irrigation of 40 mL/min does not generate damage up to a power of 40 W.
Prof. Liatsikos asked what the right balance is between temperature and pressure in order to navigate completely on the safe side. Most stones are infected with bacteria, so pumping results in seeding bacteria into the bloodstream and can result in sepsis. The literature clearly states that intrapelvic pressure needs to be <30 mmHg. In the absence of a UAS, forced irrigation can get excessively high, up to 328 mmHg [10]. Only when we have scopes with pressure sensors will we be able to avoid consequent renal extravasation, haematoma, urinoma, sepsis, post-operative pain, and renal scarring as a long-term impact, he noted.
Again, using an access sheath reduces sepsis from 15.2% to 4.3%, possibly attributable to decreased intrapelvic pressure [11]. The access sheath keeps the pressures to a reasonable level. If the ratio of the ureteroscope diameter/inner diameter of the sheath is <0.75, then the flow and intrapelvic pressure is acceptable [12]. In a recent publication, Prof. Liatsikos’ team recorded the maximal renal pelvic pressure during ureteroscopy using an animal model and learned that when using a pump, you need to ascertain that there is an outflow from the kidney. It is important to keep in mind that the threshold for pyelovenous backflow is 40-60 cm H2O or 30-45 mmHg, noting that the units here are important to keep straight [13].
Many centres will encourage flexible systems because of cost issues, but it is easy to thermoablate healthy parenchyma collaterally. A lot of technology and equipment is implemented, but we do not have enough information on how to use it safely. In the near future, pressure and temperature sensors will be integrated into the new scopes and we may look back at the flexible systems and realise how damaging these really were.
- Liatsikos E, et al. EAU20 Virtual Congress, 17-26 July 2020, State-of-the-art lecture.
- Winship B, et al. J Endourol. 2019;33(10):794-799.
- Hein S, et al. World J Urol. 2020;38(3):753-760.
- Andreeva V, et al. World J Urol. 2020;38(2):497-503.
- Peng Y, et al. J Endourol. 2020;34(1):88-92.
- Noureldin YA, et al. World J Urol. 2020
- Breda A, et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2016;26(1):70-75.
- Maxwell AD, et al. J Endourol. 2019;33(2):113-119.
- Wollin DA, et al. J Endourol. 2018;32(1):59-63.
- Jung H, Osther PJ. Springerplus. 2015;4:373.
- Traxer O, et al. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):2137-2144
- Fang L, et al. J Endourol. 2019;33(2):132-139.
- Noureldin YA, et al. J Endourol. 2019;33(9):725-729.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Radiation stewardship for patient and endourologist Next Article
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: lower morbidity »
« Radiation stewardship for patient and endourologist Next Article
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: lower morbidity »
Table of Contents: EAU 2020
Featured articles
Surgical Techniques and Safety
The new adjustable artificial sphincter victo: Surgical technique and results after a follow-up of more than one year
New urosepsis data from the SERPENS study
Stones
Intra-operative cone-beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Pressure and temperature: do high-power lasers pose a threat?
Radiation stewardship for patient and endourologist
New lithotripter data: improved stone clearance
Renal Cancer
Beyond the limits of ultrasound: Three dimensional augmented reality robot assisted partial nephrectomy (3D AR-RAPN) for complex renal masses
Imaging guided surgery with augmented reality for robotic partial nephrectomy
KEYNOTE-426: no QoL differences pembrolizumab + axitinib versus sunitinib
Debate: upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy or not?
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: lower morbidity
Bladder Cancer
Reduced BCG frequency, faster NMIBC recurrence
Nadofaragene firadenovec effective in BCG-unresponsive papillary NMIBC
Understanding MIBC biology for novel treatment options
Prostate Cancer & Imaging
Transperineal laser ablation of prostate
Prostatectomy: R-LRPE better than LRPE for continence
PSMA PET-CT staging is 27% more accurate
Docetaxel + hormonal therapy: improved prostate cancer PFS
ARAMIS subgroup analysis: darolutamide benefits across PSADT groups
Large patient-driven survey reveals QoL issues after prostate cancer treatment
Targeting steroid sulphatase in resistant prostate cancer cells
Good tolerance of post-RP radiotherapy ± short-term ADT
BPH & LUTS
Minimizing post-operative stress urinary incontinence after HoLEP: Our preliminary experience and short-term results of ‘’En Bloc’’ technique with early apical release
LUTS 2-year outcomes: aquablation versus TURP
HoLEP versus PVP in prospective randomised trial
Testis Cancer & Andrology
Peyronie’s disease: surgical options
Infertility and testis cancer risk: causal or association?
32% more men complain of reduced sex drive in 2019 versus 2009
Related Articles

May 21, 2019
Live surgery bladder tumour resection
August 24, 2020
HoLEP versus PVP in prospective randomised trial
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy