As long as no signs or symptoms of a SARS-CoV-2 infection are present, the continuation of a biologic treatment with dupilumab for AD is recommended [1,2]. Also, starting an indicated therapy with the agent should not be postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, the discussion is still ongoing about the possible effect of biologic treatment for AD on SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence and outcome prospects [3]. To gain further insight, a Canadian, multicentre cohort study investigated patients who were followed at academic centres and community practices from 11 March 2020 until 30 April 2021. Included patients were all treated with dupilumab for AD, asthma, and/or nasal polyps at this point.
Only 0.36% of the patients contracted a SARS-CoV-2 infection (2 out of 548 participants). There was 1 asymptomatic female patient aged 13 years and 1 male patient aged 18 years, the latter presenting with classic symptoms like cough, dyspnoea, fever, and anosmia. Both did not require hospitalisation or oxygen therapy. Treatment with dupilumab was stopped for the duration of the infection and resumed after 2 weeks.
As the incidence of COVID-19 was 3.2% for the general Canadian population at the end of the study period, Dr Brian Rankin (University of Calgary, Canada) and his fellow investigators underlined that the infection rate of patients on dupilumab appears to be lower.
The study authors concluded that despite some limitations of this retrospective study, the results suggest that treatment with dupilumab does not increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or worsen its signs and/or symptoms in patients with AD, asthma, and/or nasal polyps.
- Wollenberg A, et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(6):e241–e242.
- Vultaggio A, et al. Allergy. 2020;75(11):2764–2774.
- Rankin BD, et al. Incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with atopic diseases on dupilumab: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. P32414, AAD 2022 Annual Meeting, 25–29 March, Boston, MA, USA.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Type 2 asthma managed by dupilumab, despite atopic comorbidities Next Article
Inpatient dermatologic therapy is linked to lower mortality and readmission rates »
« Type 2 asthma managed by dupilumab, despite atopic comorbidities Next Article
Inpatient dermatologic therapy is linked to lower mortality and readmission rates »
Table of Contents: AAD 2022
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
New Developments and Unmet Needs in Dermatology
Light at the end of the tunnel for vitiligo therapy
Intestinal microbe-preparation: Modest activity but safe for mild psoriasis
Alopecia areata: 1-year baricitinib treatment increases success
New anticholinergic preparation is effective and tolerable in hyperhidrosis
What’s Hot in Rare Diseases
Add-on apremilast may improve recalcitrant dermatomyositis
Could dupilumab put an end to the therapeutic draught in prurigo nodularis?
Fungal skin infections in children: A diagnosis to keep in mind
Innovative gel speeds up clearance of molluscum contagiosum lesions
JAK inhibition offers promising treatment prospects for uncommon dermatoses
JAK inhibitors may offer a new horizon in the treatment of sarcoidosis
Psoriasis: State of the Art
New insights into psoriasis comorbidity
Long-term psoriasis treatment with bimekizumab results in maintained efficacy
Novel developments in topical psoriasis therapy
Atopic Dermatitis: Novel Agents Enter the Stage
JAK inhibitors in AD: Setting the efficacy bar even higher
Novel IL-4/IL-13 blocker shows high efficacy with only modest conjunctivitis signal
Posters
Inpatient dermatologic therapy is linked to lower mortality and readmission rates
AD treatment during the pandemic: dupilumab does not raise COVID-19 infection risk
Upadacitinib: Fast and more pronounced skin improvement in AD patients
Dermatology diseases need the highest doses of biologics
Related Articles

November 18, 2021
Existing and upcoming small molecules in psoriasis
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy