Notice: Undefined index: new_doi_fields in /home/daan/projects/medicalconferences_dev/wp-content/themes/writers-blogily-child/functions.php on line 138
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/daan/projects/medicalconferences_dev/wp-content/themes/writers-blogily-child/functions.php on line 138
Notice: Undefined index: new_doi_fields in /home/daan/projects/medicalconferences_dev/wp-content/themes/writers-blogily-child/functions.php on line 174
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/daan/projects/medicalconferences_dev/wp-content/themes/writers-blogily-child/functions.php on line 174
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/daan/projects/medicalconferences_dev/wp-content/themes/writers-blogily-child/functions.php on line 175
Glatiramer acetate has been licensed as an injectable treatment for relapsing MS in Europe for over 20 years; follow-on glatiramer acetate received approval in 2016. Various oral DMTs have become available on the European market for the treatment of relapsing MS, including dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. However, overall real-world data on treatment patterns and associated health outcomes in patients with relapsing MS using these DMTs are limited.
The retrospective database analysis presented by Prof. Tjalf Ziemssen (University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Germany) evaluated patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns (switching and discontinuation) among relapsing MS patients on abovementioned DMTs [1]. Of 16,283 patients with relapsing MS, 1,577 patients met all inclusion criteria. The group of patients using follow-on glatiramer acetate was too small for further analyses.
While interferons were the most frequently used DMTs in the pre-index period for all groups, patients in the glatiramer acetate cohort had the lowest proportion of interferon use during the pre-index period.
Patients who were prescribed glatiramer acetate and dimethyl fumarate were generally comparable in terms of demographics, overall relapse rate, and treatment persistence. Patients prescribed teriflunomide were numerically older and exhibited more comorbidities, as well as lower pre- and post-treatment overall relapse rate than the glatiramer acetate and DMF cohorts. Despite different administration methods and mechanisms of action, similar overall relapse rates and treatment persistence were observed across all 3 treatment groups.
- Ziemssen T, et al. Real-world demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients on disease-modifying therapy (encore abstract from ACTRIMS/ECTRIMS). ECF 28th Annual Meeting. Abstract 24.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Decreased EDSS after plasma exchange in NMOSD Next Article
Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing MS »
« Decreased EDSS after plasma exchange in NMOSD Next Article
Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing MS »
Table of Contents: ECF 2020
Featured articles
ECF Round-Up Articles
No association between Ig levels and infection in ofatumumab-treated patients with relapsing MS
Defining phenotypes of MS-related cognitive impairment
First long-term efficacy data of a BTK inhibitor
Novel disease-specific scale confirms huge impact of fatigue
Progressive aerobic exercise improves fatigue
Reliable and convenient method to assess cognitive function in MS patients
Tackling unmet MS-related cognitive challenges
Real-world efficacy of ocrelizumab in MS patients
Similar demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns in German claims study
Decreased EDSS after plasma exchange in NMOSD
No support for IVIG as treatment of acute attacks in NMOSD
Related Articles
January 12, 2022
Long COVID “brain fog” shares features with “chemo brain”
August 18, 2021
No higher early MS relapse frequency after stopping ponesimod
July 30, 2019
Possibly lifesaving therapy in refractory PML
© 2021 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy